Spanish journalist or Russian spy? The mystery around Pablo González’s double life

Spanish journalist or Russian spy? The mystery around Pablo González’s double life
This photo shared on social media sought the release of Spanish journalistPablo González from detention by Polish authorities, who arrested him in 2022 for allegedly spying for Russia. (Social media)
Short Url
Updated 04 August 2024
Follow

Spanish journalist or Russian spy? The mystery around Pablo González’s double life

Spanish journalist or Russian spy? The mystery around Pablo González’s double life
  • Friends had organized protests in Spain demanding his release as Polish authorities kept him detained without charges
  • His inclusion from last week's US-Russia prisoner swap appears to confirm suspicions that he was a indeed Russian operative using his cover as a journalist

WARSAW, Poland: When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, reporters from around the world rushed to the Polish-Ukrainian border to cover an exodus of refugees fleeing Russian bombs.
Among them was Pablo González, a freelance journalist from Spain who had been based in Poland since 2019, working for Spanish news agency EFE, Voice of America and other outlets. Warsaw-based reporters knew him as an outgoing colleague who liked to drink beer and sing karaoke into the wee hours of the morning.
Two and a half years later, he was sent to Moscow as part of a prisoner swap, leaving behind both mysteries about who he really was and concerns about how Poland handled a case in which he was accused of being a Russian agent.
In the first days of the war, González provided stand-up reports to TV viewers in Spain against a backdrop of refugees arriving at the train station in the Polish border town of Przemysl.
But less than week into the war, Polish security agents entered the room he was staying in and arrested him. They accused him of “participating in foreign intelligence activities against Poland” and said he was an agent of the GRU, Russian military intelligence.




A man identified as Pablo González, a freelance Spanish journalist who has been based in Poland since 2019, second from left, with shaved head, listens to Russian President Vladimir Putin following the biggest prisoner swap between the US and Russia in post-Soviet history, upon their arrival at the Vnukuvo government airport outside Moscow on August 1, 2024. Gonzalez had another passport and another name: Pavel Rubtsov. (Sputnik, Kremlin Pool via AP)

Friends were astonished — and, as Poland held González without trial for months that turned into years, some grew skeptical and organized protests in Spain demanding his release. Authorities have never detailed the accusations.
But on Thursday evening, the burly 42-year-old with a shaved head and beard was welcomed home by President Vladimir Putin after being freed in the largest prisoner swap since the Soviet era.
His inclusion in the deal appears to confirm suspicions that González was a Russian operative using his cover as a journalist.
Born Pavel Rubtsov in 1982 in then-Soviet Moscow, González went to Spain with his Spanish mother at age 9, where he became a citizen and received the Spanish name of Pablo González Yagüe. He went into journalism, working for outlets Público, La Sexta and Gara, a Basque nationalist newspaper.
It’s not clear what led Poland to arrest him. The investigation remains classified and the spokesman for the secret services told The Associated Press that he could not say anything beyond what was in a brief statement. Poland is on high alert after a string of arrests of espionage suspects and sabotage, part of what the authorities view as hybrid warfare by Russia and Belarus against the West.
Polish security services said Poland included him in the deal due to the close Polish-American alliance and “common security interests.” In their statement, they said that “Pavel Rubtsov, a GRU officer arrested in Poland in 2022, (had been) carrying out intelligence tasks in Europe.”
The head of Britain’s MI6 agency, Sir Richard Moore, said at the Aspen Security Forum in 2022 that González was an “illegal” who was arrested in Poland after “masquerading as a Spanish journalist.”
“He was trying to go into Ukraine to be part of their destabilizing efforts there,” Moore said.
Another hint at his activities came from independent Russian outlet Agentstvo, which reported that in 2016 Rubtsov befriended and spied on Zhanna Nemtsova, the daughter of Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, who was murdered in Moscow in 2015.
Poland-based journalists who knew González said he used his base in Poland to travel to former Soviet countries including Ukraine and Georgia. He had a license to operate a drone and used it to film Auschwitz-Birkenau from the air for coverage on the 75th anniversary of the death camp’s liberation in 2020.
Voice of America, a US-government funded organization, confirmed that he worked briefly for them, but they have since removed any of his work from their website.
“Pablo González contributed to a few VOA stories as a freelancer over a relatively short period of time starting in late 2020,” spokesperson Emily Webb said in reply to an emailed query. “As a freelancer who provided content to a number of media outlets, his services were arranged through a third-party company used by news organizations around the world.”
“At no time did he have any access to any VOA systems or VOA credentials,” Webb said. “As soon as VOA learned of the allegations, we removed his material.”
Because Poland’s justice system was politicized under a populist government that ruled in 2015-23, some activists worried about whether his rights were respected. Reporters Without Borders was among the groups that called for him to be put on trial or released.
The group stands by its position that he should not have been held that long without trial. “You are innocent until a trial proves you guilty,” Alfonso Bauluz, the head of the group’s office in Spain told AP on Friday. He expressed frustration at the silence around the case, and the fact that there will apparently not be a trial at all, saying Poland has not presented the evidence it has against him.
But the group also says it expects González to provide an explanation now that he is free.
Jaap Arriens, a Dutch video journalist based in Warsaw, hung out with the man he knew as Pablo in Warsaw and Kyiv, as well as in Przemysl shortly before his arrest.
Arriens described him as a friendly, funny man with a macho demeanor and a chest covered in tattoos that he once showed off in a bar.
González mostly fit in, but seemed better-off than the average freelance journalist. He always seemed to have the newest and most expensive phones and computers, working at the Poland-Ukraine border with the latest 14-inch MacBook Pro. He had plenty of money to spend in bars.
He recalled González once saying: “Life is good, life is almost too good.”
“And I thought: ‘Man, freelance life is never too good. What are you talking about?’ I don’t know any freelancer who talks like this.”
González, whose grandfather emigrated from Spain to the Soviet Union as a child during the Spanish Civil War, was known as a Basque nationalist with ties to the region’s independence movement.
Russia is suspected of supporting separatist movements in Spain and elsewhere in an effort to destabilize Europe.
González’ wife in Spain had been advocating on his behalf during his detention in Poland, even though they were not living together at the time of his arrest.
Over the past years, the suspect’s supporters ran an account on Twitter, now X, to advocate for his release.
When he was sent to Moscow on Thursday, the @FreePabloGonzález account tweeted: “This is our last tweet: Pablo is finally free. Endless thanks to all.”
Those who have followed the case are now awaiting González’s next moves.
He has Spanish citizenship — and the right to return to the European Union. His wife was quoted in Spanish media saying she hopes he can return to Spain.


Report finds e-commerce platform Etsy profiting from illegal Israeli settlements

Report finds e-commerce platform Etsy profiting from illegal Israeli settlements
Updated 07 August 2024
Follow

Report finds e-commerce platform Etsy profiting from illegal Israeli settlements

Report finds e-commerce platform Etsy profiting from illegal Israeli settlements
  • Investigation identified at least 44 shops operating from 16 illegal settlements, but claims there could be “many more”
  • Etsy could face allegations of money laundering if proceeds found to have entered Irish financial system where subsidiary is located

LONDON: A new report has revealed that the American e-commerce platform Etsy is conducting business with dozens of shops located in illegal Israeli settlements.

Published jointly by the Institute for Journalism and Social Change, Global Justice Now, and War on Want, the report identified at least 44 Etsy stores operating in 16 different settlements considered illegal by the UN and international law as of July.

“Etsy isn’t simply turning a blind eye to stores listed on its site operating in illegal Israeli settlements, it is directly profiting from and even, in certain cases, promoting them,” said Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now.

“Doing so risks complicity in war crimes, and the reality is, they’re not the only company profiting from the human misery inflicted on Palestinians day in, day out. It’s time to bring an end to this shameless corporate profiteering.”

Most of the identified shops are located in the West Bank, including 14 in Ariel and at least nine in Maale Adumim, two of the largest illegal settlements and frequent sites of conflict following expansion plans.

The report also noted that with hundreds more sellers listed simply under “Israel” without specific locations, there could be many more Etsy stores operating from illegal settlements.

Claire Provost, report author and co-founder and co-director of the Institute for Journalism and Social Change, explained that despite “explicit connections” between the hosts and locations, “so far, these ties have gone under the radar and unchallenged.”

“Western complicity in Israeli war crimes is so pervasive that even Etsy, the popular platform for ‘feel good’ shopping, is connected to businesses in the settlements,” Provost said.

Etsy, which operates in Israel through its subsidiary Etsy Ireland UC, could face questions and allegations of money-laundering if proceeds from illegal settlement businesses are found to be entering the Irish financial system.

A similar complaint involving booking.com, filed in November 2023, is currently under investigation by authorities in the Netherlands.

The company said that it disagreed with the allegations and emphasized that “no laws prohibit listings in illegal Israeli settlements.” However, the outcome of the investigation could set a precedent for operations in Israeli settlements.

In response to the findings, Etsy announced an internal review and stated that it seeks to “comply with applicable laws, including relevant anti-money laundering and sanctions laws.”

“By promoting business in Israel’s illegal settlements, Etsy is aiding and abetting the war crimes of both forced displacement of the indigenous people and the transfer of civilians of the occupying force into occupied territory,” said Neil Sammonds, senior campaigner on Palestine at War on Want.

“Etsy’s complicity extends to the crime of apartheid. It must cease these heinous, unlawful activities immediately.”


Musk’s X accuses advertisers of boycotting platform in new lawsuit

Musk’s X accuses advertisers of boycotting platform in new lawsuit
Updated 07 August 2024
Follow

Musk’s X accuses advertisers of boycotting platform in new lawsuit

Musk’s X accuses advertisers of boycotting platform in new lawsuit
  • Lawsuit accuse advertisers of withhelding billions of dollars in advertising revenue from X
  • Ad revenue on X has slumped since Musk took over the platform

LONDON: Elon Musk’s social media platform X on Tuesday sued a global advertising alliance and several major companies, including Mars and CVS Health, accusing them of unlawfully conspiring to boycott the site and causing it to lose revenue.
X filed the lawsuit in federal court in Texas against the World Federation of Advertisers, Unilever and Danish renewable energy company Orsted, in addition to Mars and CVS Health.
The lawsuit said advertisers, acting through a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, collectively withheld “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter.
It said they acted against their own economic self-interests in a conspiracy against the platform that violated US antitrust law.
The World Federation of Advertisers, Unilever, Mars and CVS Health did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Orsted declined to comment on Wednesday.
In a statement on Tuesday about the lawsuit, X’s chief executive Linda Yaccarino said “people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is constricted. No small group of people should monopolize what gets monetized.”
Ad revenue at X slumped for months after Musk bought the company in 2022. Some advertisers had been wary of ad spending under Musk amid questions and fears that their brands would appear next to harmful content that under prior owners might have been removed.
The advertising group launched the responsible media initiative in 2019 to “help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising.”
Christine Bartholomew, an antitrust expert and professor at University at Buffalo’s law school told Reuters that lawsuits alleging unlawful boycotts can face a high bar.
X must show that there was an actual agreement to boycott joined by each advertiser, Bartholomew said. “Proving this requirement is no small hurdle” in cases where an agreement might be implicit, she said.
Even if the case succeeds, X cannot force companies to spend ad revenue on the platform, Bartholomew said.
The case was filed in the Northern District of Texas and assigned to US District Judge Reed O’Connor. The district has become a favored destination for conservatives suing to block Biden administration policies.
X said in its lawsuit that it has applied brand-safety standards that are comparable to those of its competitors and that “meet or exceed” measures specified by the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.
The lawsuit said X has become a “less effective competitor” in the sale of digital advertising.
X is seeking unspecified damages and a court order against any continued efforts to conspire to withhold ad dollars.
Video-sharing company Rumble on Tuesday filed a separate antitrust lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers.

The Yazidi nightmare
Ten years after the genocide, their torment continues
Enter
keywords

UN expert condemns Israeli killing of Al Jazeera journalist, urges war crime prosecution

UN expert condemns Israeli killing of Al Jazeera journalist, urges war crime prosecution
Updated 06 August 2024
Follow

UN expert condemns Israeli killing of Al Jazeera journalist, urges war crime prosecution

UN expert condemns Israeli killing of Al Jazeera journalist, urges war crime prosecution
  • Ismail Al-Ghoul and Ramy El Rify were deliberately killed in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza
  • IDF says Ghoul was a Hamas operative who took part in the Oct. 7 attack against Israel

ZURICH: A United Nations expert on Tuesday condemned Israel’s killing last week of Al Jazeera journalist Ismail Al-Ghoul and cameraman Ramy El Rify in Gaza and urged that the deaths be prosecuted as a war crime.
The two men died in a July 31 airstrike by the Israeli military, which said Al-Ghoul was a Hamas operative who took part in the Oct. 7 attack against Israel.
The Israel Defense Forces has released a document seized from Hamas computers that it said corroborates its claim.
“I strongly denounce the deliberate targeting by Israel of two journalists in Gaza, which adds to an already appalling toll of reporters and media workers killed in this war,” Irene Khan, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, said in a statement.
Israel’s military said Al-Ghoul belonged to the elite Nukhba unit and was involved in recording and publicizing attacks on Israeli troops.
Al Jazeera rejected what it said were “baseless allegations” and said Al-Ghoul had worked for the network since November 2023 and his only profession was as a journalist.
The IDF said the Hamas documents it had seized in Gaza listed members of the organization’s military wing, and that as of 2021, Al-Ghoul had been an engineer in the Hamas Gaza Brigade.
Khan said journalists are protected as civilians under international humanitarian law and targeting them deliberately was a war crime. That status is only forfeit if they participate directly in hostilities, and Israel had not provided concrete evidence of that, she said.
“Given Israel’s failure to heed earlier calls for accountability, I urge the International Criminal Court to move swiftly to prosecute the killings of journalists in Gaza as a war crime and call on the international community to urgently consider the use of international mechanisms to investigate crimes against journalists in Gaza,” she added.

The Yazidi nightmare
Ten years after the genocide, their torment continues
Enter
keywords

British Muslim MP accuses host of ‘sneering contempt’ over UK riots interview

British Muslim MP accuses host of ‘sneering contempt’ over UK riots interview
Updated 06 August 2024
Follow

British Muslim MP accuses host of ‘sneering contempt’ over UK riots interview

British Muslim MP accuses host of ‘sneering contempt’ over UK riots interview
  • Zarah Sultana spoke about the importance of calling the incidents ‘Islamophobic’
  • Good Morning Britain host Ed Balls repeatedly interrupted her in ‘unacceptable and deeply uncomfortable’ interview

LONDON: British Muslim MP Zarah Sultana has accused Good Morning Britain presenter Ed Balls of attempting to patronize her during a Monday morning interview about the recent far-right riots in the UK.

Labour’s Sultana engaged in a heated debate with the presenter and former politician, emphasizing the importance of labeling the far-right violence as “Islamophobic.”

“The sneering contempt of ‘journalists’ will never stop me from calling out racism and Islamophobic hate,” Sultana wrote on X.

During the interview, Balls repeatedly interrupted Sultana, accusing her of not answering the questions.

“If you want to answer the questions, you can but you don’t have to,” Balls told Sultana.

In a tense exchange, co-presenter Kate Garraway asked Sultana why it was important to use the term “Islamophobic” alongside “racist” and “thuggery” to describe the events. Balls interrupted again, stating: “They definitely said racist over the weekend.”

As Sultana explained how protesters attacked a mosque over the weekend, Balls interjected once more, saying: “But Keir Starmer has condemned that,” to which Sultana replied: “I’m just finishing the question if that’s OK.”

The incident has sparked online criticism, with some calling the episode “unacceptable and deeply uncomfortable,” and accusing Balls of being “reckless” for his repeated interruptions of the MP.

Balls and ITV faced scrutiny for interviewing his wife, UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, on the same program, raising questions about the impartiality of the interview.

The UK has been grappling with a wave of far-right violence, including attacks on hotels housing asylum seekers.

The unrest follows a stabbing rampage at a dance class in Southport that left three girls dead and several injured, fueled by false online rumors that the 17-year-old suspect was a Muslim immigrant.

The Yazidi nightmare
Ten years after the genocide, their torment continues
Enter
keywords

Meta apologizes over removal of Malaysia PM posts on Hamas leader

Meta apologizes over removal of Malaysia PM posts on Hamas leader
Updated 06 August 2024
Follow

Meta apologizes over removal of Malaysia PM posts on Hamas leader

Meta apologizes over removal of Malaysia PM posts on Hamas leader
  • Meta said post was removed by mistake
  • Apologize ccomes a day after Anwar’s office summoned Meta representatives to seek an explanation

KUALA LUMPUR: Tech giant Meta apologized Tuesday for removing social media posts by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim about the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.
The apology came a day after Anwar’s office summoned Meta representatives to seek an explanation on why the leader’s Facebook and Instagram posts about Haniyeh’s death had been removed.
Meta is the parent firm of the two popular social media platforms.
“We apologize for an operational error where content from the Prime Minister’s Facebook and Instagram Pages were removed,” Meta said in a statement emailed to AFP.
“The content has since been restored with the correct newsworthy label.”
The political leader of Palestinian armed group Hamas was killed in the Iranian capital Tehran on Wednesday in an attack blamed on Israel, which has not directly commented on it.
Anwar’s posts included a video showing the premier on a phone call with a Hamas official, offering his condolences.
On Instagram, there was a note by Meta, shared by Anwar, that the posts were taken down because of association with “dangerous individuals and organizations.”
Anwar’s office had described Meta’s removal of the posts as “a blatant suppression of free expression” and demanded an apology from the tech behemoth.
Anwar last week accused the tech giant of “cowardice” for removing his posts.
Israel, the United States and the European Union consider Hamas a terrorist organization.
Anwar, who met Haniyeh in Qatar in May, has defended Malaysia’s ties with the Iran-backed Palestinian militant group, which launched a deadly attack against Israel on October 7 that triggered the war in Gaza.
Anwar stressed during a visit to Germany in March that Malaysia’s links were with Hamas’ political wing and not with its military arm.